Tables Comparing 18 Caloric-Restricted Volunteers with a Control Group
Background:
These tables summarize the findings of a recent Washington
University study1 of 18 individuals who had been caloric-restricted (CR) for
a period ranging from 3 to 15 years, with an average caloric-restricted diet
duration of 6 years. The caloric-restricted volunteers ranged in age from 35 to
82, with an average age of 58, and had been typical members of the U. S.
population prior to their adoption of a caloric-restricted diet. (See the Pre-CR
column in Table 1 below) Their atherosclerosis risk factors before they
begin CR (Column 2) are very close to the values for the Controls. (Column 1).. Only in diastolic blood pressure (with an
average diastolic blood pressure of 80) did the 18 volunteers present
significantly better than average values.
Table 1: Serial Measurements of Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis in CR Individuals
|
Parameter |
Controls |
Pre-CR |
1-Year CR |
Present |
% Change |
| Body Mass Index (BMI),kg/m2 | 25.5 | 24.5 ± 2.6 | 20.9 ± 2.4 | 19.5 ± 2.1 | -20.4 % |
| Total Cholesterol, mg/dl | 205 ± 40 | 194 ± 45 | 161 ± 31 | 157 ± 38 | -19.1 % |
| LDL-C, mg/dl | 127 ± 35 | 122 ± 36 | 89 ± 24 | 86 ± 17 | -29.5 % |
| HDL-C, mg/dl | 48 ± 11 | 43 ± 8 | 58 ± 13 | 65 ± 24 | +54.7 % |
| Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio | 4.5 ± 1.3 | 4.1 ± 1 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | -39% |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 147 ± 89 | 149 ± 87 | 112 ± 12 | 97 ± 8 | -34.9 % |
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mm. Hg | 129 ± 13 | 132 ± 15 | 112 ± 12 | 97 ± 8 | -26.5% |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure, mm. Hg | 95 ± 8 | 80 ± 11 | 69 ± 7 | 59 ± 5 | -26.3 % |
The Washington University researchers were
amazed at their findings2. The CR volunteers exhibited blood
lipid and blood sugar numbers3 that are characteristic of adults
decades younger4 .Table 2 (below) presents a few additional
risk factors beyond those given in Table 1.
Table 2: Risk
Factors for Atherosclerosis
|
Parameter |
Calorie-Restricted |
Controls |
P Value |
| Total Cholesterol, mg/dl | 158 ± 39 | 205 ± 40 | 0.001 |
| LDL-C, mg/dl | 86 ± 28 | 127 ± 35 | 0.0001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dl | 63 ± 19 | 48 ± 11 | 0.006 |
| Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 1.3 | 0.0001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 48 ± 15 | 147 ± 89 | 0.0001 |
| Triglycerides/HDL-C Ratio | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 2.8 | 0.0001 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mm. Hg | 99 ± 10 | 129 ± 13 | 0.0001 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure, mm. Hg | 61 ± 6 | 95 ± 8 | 0.0001 |
| Fasting Glucose, mg/dl | 81 ± 7 | 95 ± 8 | 0.0001 |
| Fasting Insulin | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 2 | 0.0001 |
| Hi-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, mg/ml | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 2.2 | 0.001 |
The numbers cited in the table below illustrate the effects of
caloric-restriction upon the eight members of the Biosphere II team in the early 90's, who
were forced into caloric-restriction by an inability to grow enough food during
the two years they were confined within Biosphere II. Like the 18 participents
in the Washington University study, whose age-related biomarker changes are
summarized in tables 1 and 2 above, they also experienced
major improvements in health-related indices, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Effects of 6 to 8 Months of
Caloric Restriction Upon the 8 Biosphere II Team Members
| Test or Determination | Average Percent Change |
| Weight | 14 % decrease |
| Systolic blood pressure | 18% decrease |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 28% decrease |
| Blood sugar | 21% decrease |
| Cholesterol | 36% decrease |
| White blood cell count | 31% |
| Insulin | 42% decrease |
| T3 (a thyroid hormone) | 19% decrease |
| Renin | gradual decrease |
| Glycosated hemoglobin | gradual decrease |
| Triglycerides | gradual decrease |
Calorie-Restriction
Appears to Partially Reverse Aging, As Well As Slowing It Down.
If caloric-restriction merely slowed the rate of aging, there
would be no immediate change in these age-related biomarkers. Instead, they
would simply deteriorate more slowly in the future. However, these results
indicate what gene-chip
studies imply5: that there is actual partial rejuvenation taking place.
Regardless of whether or not caloric restriction increases
the lifespan, it clearly
markedly improves current health6, and this alone is worth the price of
admission.
You've Probably Already Experienced This and
Didn't Know It!
There's nothing mysterious about caloric restriction. You've
probably already experienced this. It happens whenever you lose weight over an
extended period of time... e. g., with Weight Watchers. What hasn't been known
is what effect this was having upon us.
Caloric Restriction Is Just a Fancy Name for
Slimming Down, and Then Not Eating Too Much
From a pragmatic standpoint, calorie restriction is just a
fancy name for losing weight down to slim and trim, and then trying to eat just
enough that you don't lose any more weight, rather than trying not to eat so
much that you put on more weight. Must of us try to eat as much as we can
without gaining weight, and for me at least, that never worked very well. Now
and then, I would eat a little too much, and over time, my weight would creep
back up again.
It's important any time you're on a diet that you be careful
that you get all the necessary nutrients so that you're not malnourished. This
can be tricky when you have a low caloric intake. Also, eating right and living
well can add, perhaps, a decade to your lifespan independently of
caloric-restriction.
It's also important that you lose weight slowly... no more
than a pound a week, and preferably less.
Most of us don't get hungry on caloric-restricted diets.
This calorie restriction response is more than just slowing
the rate of aging by burning life's candle slower. It appears to me to be an evolutionary
mechanism conserved across the plant and animal kingdoms allowing organisms to
switch from a modus vivendi
optimized for reproduction to a mode of existence
optimized for survival. Changes are triggered at the cellular level increasing
DNA repair and partially reversing numerous other age-related declines.
There is a wealth of valuable information on the Calorie
Restriction Society website7.
Web Addresses of
References:
1 - http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0308291101v1
2 - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3640153.stm
3 - http://my.webmd.com/content/article/85/98784.htm?lastselectedguid=%7B5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348%7D
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/85/98784.htm?lastselectedguid=%7B5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348%7D
4 - http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3927655
5 - http://www.biomarkerinc.com/html/04_23_03.htm
6 - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64170-2004May3.html
7 - http://www.calorierestriction.org/