7/16/2001: Book Review: Dr. Anna Roe's, "The
Making of a Scientist"
In the early 1950's
Dr. Anna Roe carried out a study of 60 eminent U. S. scientists
to try to learn what it was that made them eminent. In 1952, she
published the results of her study in a book called, "The
Making of a Scientist". In the book, she presents the results
of adult IQ tests that she administered to her 60 subjects. On
her verbal IQ test, the "verbal IQ's" of her 60 scientists
ranged from 121 to 177, with a median "verbal IQ" of
166. On her "spatial IQ" test, they spanned a range
from 123 to 164, with a median IQ of 137. On her mathematical
test, their "mathematical IQ's" stretched from 128 to
194 (raw score of 27 out of 39 questions), with a median value
of 154. But on this mathematics test, these were the scores made
by the "second string". The physicists' scores were
excluded because the test was too easy for them. They sailed through
it with perfect or almost perfect scores, giving rise to questions
about what their "mathematical IQ's" would have been
on a "mathematical IQ test" with enough headroom to
accommodate them.
The IQ's cited in Dr. Roe's study have been
and continue to be widely quoted in relation to the IQ's of eminent
scientists, so I decided to dredge up a copy of her book and judge
for myself how she managed to measure adult IQ's at far higher
levels than others have claimed. Are these deviation IQ's or ratio
IQ's? are they based upon a standard deviation fo 15 or 16?
Also, if her VSM test really can assess IQ's far above those illuminable
by any other IQ test, why is it no longer in use?
7/12/2001: Tonight, I'm
trying a change that I hope can lead to improvements in this web
site. Instead of presenting the week's news on one web page, I'm
presenting "Today's Science News" a day at a time, with
the option of viewing the week's news if desired. With 50 items
a day appearing here, it can take a while for 300 or 350 items
to load. Also, by backing off to one page a day, with weekly backup
on demand, I can try to add images and, perhaps, brief commentary
describing a few articles. To make it possible to reach back into
the past, I'm reinstating the daily pages (please see DailyPages-2nd
Half, 2001, above). I'll also
incorporate the daily editorials into these pages, although for
your convenience, I may keep them accissible on a cumulative weekly
basis, so that you (and I) can more-easily find something that's
been written in the past.
You can see how you like it. If you don't
like it, I can change it.