Daily Investment Interpretations
July 17, 2009
2009-7-17:
The
markets marched in place today. The NASDAQ
Composite gained 1.58
points (0.08%)
to 1,886.61,
the Dow added
32.12
points (0.37%)
to
close at 8,743.94,
and the S&P
500 fell 0.36
points (-0.04%)
to end at 940.38
Oil ended the day up
slightly at
$63.37
a barrel, while gold
lost $2
to $938.
The VIX fell 1.08
to 24.34.
The volume during this market advance has
been good but not great. (My technical advisory service this morning
pointed that out.) At this point, the market could go up or down. My
Chinese stocks jumped a percent or two today.
The next problem area is tipped to be in commercial
real estate. Apparently, this is returning to the news.
In Boiling the Frog,
Paul Krugman observes that the U. S. managed to sidestep a second
Great Depression by pouring money into the banks. Now that the
initial crisis has passed, though, the government seems to be
leaning back in the saddle at a time when it's become evident that a
second stimulus package is going to be needed to keep the economy
afloat.
This situation is even worse when it comes to
climate change. The forecasts are becoming catastrophic. Meanwhile,
the nation drifts.
This brings up a point: the same disinformation
strategies mounted by powerful industrial lobbies that were so
successful in postponing the linking of cholesterol intake with
heart disease, and the linking of smoking with lung cancer are now
being used by companies like Exxon Mobil to discredit the connection
between global warming and the burning of fossil fuels. It's very
easy to run a calculation of the total amount of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere (about 387 parts per million, or 3 trillion tonnes)
with the buildup of carbon dioxide since the first measurements were
made in 1958, and to compare the total amount of carbon dioxide
generated by deforestation and by the coal and oil that have been
burned over the past two centuries (about 1 trillion tonnes). You
find out in a hurry that the carbon dioxide produced by fossil fuels
roughly matches the carbon dioxide added to the Earth's
atmosphere.
The "experts" who are testifying that
global warming isn't real include the same "experts" who
testified years ago that smoking wasn't harmful to your health.
(Half a century ago, I had a rude awakening with one of these
"experts". We didn't have any conflicts... I was a lowly
graduate student... but I got a close-up look at what he was like.)
In Permanent Link to Opinions for sale,
Paul Krugman warns, "Despite
everything that’s happened, I don’t think many people grasp just
how raw, how explicit, the corruption of our institutions has
become."